Small minds think small

In a recent speech by Obama, one hearing it, would have to think that Obama just got back from a trip to Lilliput. Now he is saying that the citizens of this Nation have to learn to live and I guess, think small, i.e., smaller houses, smaller homes and smaller amounts to eat. In this speech, I guess he was trying to give credence to term: Small men think Small thoughts. Must I remind this man, who wants to be our next President, that a great many of our citizens of today, have already lived through such condition's, particularly during the depressions year's of l929-l940. I can see no reason why anyone with even half a brain would want to take us back to those years. Mr. Obama, you talk like a fellow named Rip Van Winkle, who laid down for a nap and only to wake up years later in a new world. In short, time had passed him by. You are suppose to pushing the party line of Progressive not Regressive. Wake UP! Your Uncle story, it seems, was apparently not a true story and I guess it was just another Fairy Book Story. The more you talk, the more we are given to question your abilities, qualifications to be the President of this Nation. This land, this country was built by Giants not pygmies. In my mind, you have yet to grasp the Greatness of the very country you want to lead. I think the job calls for a man of Experience in the Real World! MEMORY: "To be ignorant of what happened before you were even born is to be ever a child. For what what is man' s lifetime unless the memory of past events is woven with those of earlier times. Cicero The Messenger.

Getting a bad Rap.

Today, memorial day, is day when we at least show a semblance of appreciation to our service men both past and present. However, President Bush, never seems to get any recognition for the Outstanding Conduct he has shown to bring the enemies of the World to task for their dastardly deeds, throughout the Globe. Somehow, the ignorants, those of little accomplishment the know nothings, the do nothings now prevalent within the lower class of dumb-downed citizens within our country cannot understand Loyalty! There is an old saying that: If you do nothing your can't be blamed for anything! After Eight years of a Draft dodging Commander In Chief, who not only failed to act or when he did act, he acted inappropriately or in a cowardly manner. I will not, at this time, explore Clintons record, in this message, but I will eventually do so, and in its factually and historical truth. Lets just say, that due to his inaction or inappropriate action, our country was, eventually, to suffer the events of 9/11. Also, there is now, within the Democratic Party, a congressional body of Political Hacks, who are trying to do their worst, to destroy the Presidency of George W. Bush. I, have lived through the great depression and up to this date, I have had to witness Wars not of our choosing our making such as World War II, the Korean War, the VitnamWar and the false war initiated by Clinton. Still there is amongst our citizens, a willingness to blame a man of action for what he did, in the defense of this nation. It has not been and never has it been the choice of the people of this nation to decide as to what wars we should prosecute, or let it develop unchecked. For the ignorant, there is no such a War. There has not been a war prior to the present one, that was designed with a cohesive exit strategy. In war their is no exit strategy but Victory. Are these Cheap shot politician's saying that the wars we have been in had a planned exit strategy, like staying in Korea for well into 50 years now, we are still their--was that a planed exit strategy? or was getting run out of Vietnam a planned strategy. If you would think so or try to defend these action--your are either an Idiot or a Democrat. Oh yes, it was not until l947 or 2 years after WWII, that the Marshal Plan was introduced in Berlin. l943, at Yalta, it was decided to divide up the spoils of war and as such, it brought about the Cold War. Geogre W. Bush, after being in office for a mear 7 months and 22 days, he was to face the greatest Challenge, in our history, for the first time an attack on American Soil. At the twin towers, or what was left of them, he swore that our nation woulde never forget this dastardly act, and with this prounouncement, he recieved a resounding roar of acclaim. Not only that he, with the advise of the CIA, Congress and the U.N. acted to defend this nation as well. He, in either of these actions, he did not break his vow to: Protect and Defend this country. Clinton Did! Today we have the unbridled ignorance of, apparently, more than half of the Country, that thinks that there is and always has been perfect WARS. Not So! I will be willing to accept a challange from Generals/Admirals and down, to challenge me in this regard. In all our previous wars of this Century and the other Past Centuries, who is willing to wage his knowledge on these matters, by putting some money up front, and challenge me. I say you show me a man, any man that thinks there has been a perfect war in our recent history, is a damn fool--be he of any rank or stature. Get off Bush's back, and take me on you damn cowards! On this Memorial Day, I wish to close with a sincere sense of Loyalty to My country and to the man who finally stepped up to the Plate and took action against those who would do harm to this country and that man is George W. Bush, who will, in history, be properly acclaimed and recognized as a Great Leader. A man, in this day and age who is unfortunately, a rare breed! "Americans have a love for the Presidency that goes beyond loyalty or party nationality, he it ours, and we exercise the right to destroy him." JOHN STEINBECK The Messenger.

Obama-back to the future speech.

Folks, I am not accusing Obama of plagiarism, but in his Speech to the Cuban audience, it was nothing but a throw back to the speech given by President Roosevelt when he was speaking before congress; even before we entered Wold War II, on the Lend Lease bill, that had recently passed on January 6, 1941, where he expressed his desire for a world built upon " The Four Freedoms" to make the world better. Obama, expressively stated in his speech, that he was in effect saying, "He is tired of old world politics that make promises that they never keep." I don't mind anyone having lofty goals and objectives, what I don't like is his going back to the future, even if it was to get an outline for his speech. Folks, this is a msan of little accomplishment prior to his run for the Presidency. Still he talks a g ood talk, but has no record of what transpired during such walks. In short what has he accomplished. To me and I guess many others, he has yet to shown the capacity necessary to lead the Greatest and Best Country on the face of this planet. Like it or not, this Country is now and in the future, to face a people a religion that wants to destroy us and all the other democracies. This war, will go on for years, regardless who is elected President. The main threat to our country, as it is now divided, is which party will be best for facing up to our Emmies. In the annals of military war, this nation is now engaging a force, that will not stand up to fight, but send women and children strapped to bombs, as the favorite choice of attack. To day, we have a Democratic Congress, that lacks the intelligence to appreciate this fact. They find it more advantages, to run our President Down, as well as our Nation. They are a POLITICAL PARTY THAT HAS ONE GOAL IN MIND--to turn this great nation into a Socialistic State. And today, across our great land, we have a bunce of exploited ignorants hooping, hollering and yes, even screaming: We want CHANGE! I say to them, be carefull or you might just get what you want! "Americans have a love for the President that goes beyond loyalty or party nationality; he is ours, and we exercise the right to destroy him." John Stienbeck The Messenger

Spider WEBB'S for brains

Congressman Webb has sponsored a bill to give our GI's a very handsome and yes even deserving Educational support, after three years of military service. Great--but not only dumb it is impractical. Yes we should have a good and rewarding bill for the services rendered, but the bill should not be counter-productive. Also, using, as an example, the GI Bill advanced after WW II is ludicrous. Those men coming out of the war were, for the most part, Draftees, that answered their Nations call. Once the war was over, they were in fact, discharged for the convince of the Government. In short, at that time they were no longer needed. However, their service time, which was disruptive to their lives, the GI Bill was not only to reward them for their service, but to help them to be rehabilitated back into the civilian population. This Bill had a positive means by giving them a chance to get a better education once they were released from their military obligation. On the other hand, for many years now, we have relied on an all Volunteer Military Force. To maintain this force, any benefits made must be a two way street. It must serve to enhance the military goals of service to the country as well as the Retention needs. It cannot be, as Designed by Congressman Webb and his cohorts, a means to reward the service man to such an extent, for minimal service with maximum benefits for all. It has to be rewarded in such a manner to serve the Country as Well as the man. This plan does not do that. Yes our service men, for time served, should be duly rewarded, however, it should not be one size fits all. Nor should it be disruptive to the maintaince of an all Volunteer Force. It must not or should not ever be a reward that would lure the service man out of the service and for only a minimal time service. It has to be based on a graduated time served plan, i, e., compensation on a length of time served scale. The longer one serves, the more he will be rewarded at the end of his tour. To do otherwise would be destructive to our military forces. To Comdr. Webb, you of all people must be aware of what such a bill, as proposed by you and your co-sponsors, would do to our Volunteer Forces--but in case you lack this level of comprehension,--IT WOULD DESTROY THE MEANS FOR RETAINING A COMPETENT MILITARY FORCE LEVEL. Sen. McCain has it right. And for you, Mr. Obama, you just don't know what the hell your talking about! "Politics is not the science of setting up a permanently impregnable society, it is the art of knowing where to go next in the exploration of an already existing traditional kind of Society." Michael Oakeshott - The Political Economy of Freedom l949 The Messenger.

History shows that at times War is necessary

War has been, down through the ages, in defense of ones nation, has always been inevitable, to secure ones society and lifestyle. As Winston Churchill once said "Still if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case, you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to parish than to live as slaves." In short, and like it or not, there will come a time when you are not given an option to fight or not. Talk has in matters of war, been greatly exaggerated. If you go back, you will, for most times, find that you cannot talk one out of a fight. In anger or when otherwise provoked, reasoning with your protagonist/enemy is all to often, out of the question. Unless one is ready and willing to stand up for himself, others or even his/her country, you will soon be vanquished by your adversaries. George Washington, in his Farewell address to our country said it loud and clear--that is that: We must always be prepared for war! Today Obama is preaching 'talk' as the preferred choice in ending conflicts. The idea that you must first talk to a potential enemy before you go to war is shown in our history that, that is the first option is Wong! History shows, that President Roosevelt was talking to two Japanese ambassadors, at the time, Japan, was attacking Pearl Harbor. It was talk being used as a subterfuge to hide the fact that we were about to be attacked. Today, we always say "Lets remember Pearl Harbor" in order that we will never forget it, as well as how we were deceived by Talk! For one with so little knowledge of our history he, Obama, sure talks a lot! "Every absurdity has a champion to defend it, for error is always talkative." Oliver Goldsmith The messenger.

The Most dangerous man in America

In my mind and after listening to as much of Obama's pie in the sky Socialism, I could tolerate, I had to write this message: That we now have a man running for the office of the Pretence of this great nation that, to my mind, is the most ill informed person regarding this nations history and its values. Obama is a man who started his campaign, stating in effect, that a lapel pin of our flag, is a political tool. I say you are either deliberately trying to make a statement that you do not honor our flag, or that you are so ill informed regarding all our flag stands for or that you know nothing regarding its glory an why it is with pride that we, the majority of the citizens of this country ware it. Perhaps this is one of the reasons you do not know how many states their are, that make up the United States. Well for your belated information there are 50 States Not 57. Now I know why you still think you visited 57 and still have one more State to go, and your right, you have still to reach a STATE of mind called Reality. In your speech, you also made the claim, ad nuseum, that John McCain claims he wants to keep our troops in Iraq for a 100 years. After being shown time and time again that he did not say it, as you claim. You, like most shysters know how to twist words and meanings. What you don't know is "what straight talk" means. Since McCain, due to his age, will not be around for a 100 years more, you must be using fuzzy math to come to the conclusion you have. Also, you should, having served in Congress, at least a little while, that such a decision, relative to how long we will stay in Iraq, is not a decision he alone could make. Believe Congress also has a voice in such matters. Get real-stop lying to the kids in you audience--they still need guidance--not lies! But of all things that pointed out your ignorance was when you claimed that it was President Bush that took us into the War with Iraq. Nuts, this war was a long time in the making, and only after a President with the backbone to stand-up to Saddam Hussein, that we entered into war with the consent of the congress. Now, a lot of them are trying to wrap their vote around the grounds that they didn't have all the facts regarding this war, prior to signing the bill to wage war against Iraq. Don't Believe me ask Hillary! It was a situation, that after 5 attacks on our nation improperly answered by the Clinton administration, coupled with 9/11, that lead Bush to take the bull-by-horns. and finally take Saddam and his band of Criminals to task. For those of you ignorants out their, prior to George Bush Becoming President, the United Nations, IAEA had made 13 attempts to find WMD's, they failed to do so. However, Bill Clinton in l998 went to the UN's to have them continue to searh for subj weapons. Folks, if the UN was making numerous searches and the Clinton administration was asking for the them to make more searches; do you no believes thinks all this effort made prior to Bush taking office was only to deceive Bush. For all of you out there in La La land the IAEA, were not looking for Easter Eggs. And don't let Obama tell you another fairy-tale! "War is itself a political act with primarily political objects and under the American form of government political officials must necessarily direct its general course. Capt. Dudley W. Knox The Messenger.

Libralism - Is nothing buty CHANGE in perpetuity.

Obama's cry for change is being acclaimed as having a new idea for Change! What is this great idea. Who Knows? Change for the sake of change, as it is being presented today, is not change, it is a lack of understanding what has transpired, within our Nation through-out its spectacular and glorious History. The Problem is that it is not American that needs a change, it is the Liberals that cannot make up their mind, hence they are always looking for change. In 1902, It was the Socialist Democratic Party, later it became the Democratic Party, now its the Liberal Democratic Party on the verge of becoming the Progressive Democratic Party. This is in essence a party that has yet to come to know itself and what it really stands for. To establish my point of view even further, I have extracted the following, from the book "Right Thinking" by James D Hornfischer, as follow: "American Liberalism is forever changing. Once it was for a color blind society, then it was for a color based society. Once it was for the sexual revolution, then it became downright puritanical and was consumed with questions of sexual harassment. It favored nuclear power beginning with the Truman administration and came to dread nuclear power as though it were commensurate with the Black Death of hoary times. It favored vigorous opposition to Communist Subversion during the Kenndy Administrating; then it favored "negotiation" over disbarment. It ceaselessly advances progress throughout American society and then abruptly changes its definition of progress. There is only one political value to which it has always remained steadfast, namely, disturbing the peace. Liberalism is history's only political movement founded on a misdemeanor." Obama is nothing but the Democrats answer to what their next change ought to be. As yet, Obama does not know or either he is to scared to admit that it is just another confused sense of reasoning trying to pass for intelligence. "It is a great ability to be able to conceal one's ability." Franqois de la Rochefoucauld The Messenger

OBama Boo-boo baby and his Dipercrats

Is it just me or has the world really gone crazy. Today we Have a dipercrat running for the Highest office in this land. and he, of all people thinks he is being picked on. Suddenly, he has a miraculous understanding of the English Language. For twenty years, he sat by and listen to a Black Raciest Ministers, who speaks to an audience that yips and yaps as their Preacher speaks only crap, It is only now, over a hundred and forty-two years ago that the blacks of this nation last felt the pangs of slavery in this great land of ours. It has been thousands, upon thousand of years since the Blacks first initiated slavery on this our planet earth. And in the nations of Africa they are still practicing these evil crimes, on people of the own--race, color and creed. Today, they, the Blacks of this country, can only see the white race, for the heinous acts perpetrated now 40,000 years all together, on their own "Bloods." Today, in the nations of African both north and south, Slavery has continued unabated all these many years. If the truth be known they, in these many long years in our past, they have killed millions of their own people and are still doing so today such as in Darfur, Ethiopia the Sudan and many more. In the United States, in this day an age, it is not the whites killing the Blacks it is the Blacks killing each other. You don't believe me, ask Bill Crosby! For you that seems only capable to hear comments about supposedly you, which never even mentioned you, makes me sick. Mr. OBama, and I use the word mister lightly, you are the lowest form of gutter snipe I have ever come across. You claim you Love American--yah you love it so much that you can hardly wait to be elected President to make only Changes that would conform to your Socialist Message. Before you make the CHANGES THAT WOULD ONLY SERVE TO DESTROY IT, read the true and factually history of this great nation before you try to ruin the whole darn thing, knowing little if nothing about its past. Mr. Obama, I was born, one of eleven children. in the year 1930 to an epileptic. As a result, I had, for over a year, a black women who was provided under the relief program, to take care of my mother ant the family. She and I had a personal, loving and lasting relationship and to this day, I considered her, for a time, my mother. I know in her heart, what she would think of you. How do I know this. Well several years later, after she left our house, I, during War II, she was on my Ice Delivery Route and on the First day I came to delivery her Ice, I, out of love for her, tried to give her ICE free. Big Mistake. She looked at me and proudly said "I ain't no Nigger-- I don't need your charity." I love this women more than I can say, my only regret is that our difference in ages, caused me to lose her while I was in the Air force. As a result I never really got to show her my love and gratitude. I will love her until the day I die All my life I have had good and enjoyable relationships with the people of all races and especially with the black race. Your Race is a Strong and powerful one, who can take care of themselves. You are doing nothing buy trying to, at this time, enslave them to a political party. I despise you for that reason and that reason alone. MLK said he was going to lead you to the Promise land, he did not say that the Democrats would do that! Before you tried to sit in the office of the President, you should first learn to respect the one we have now! _ The Messenger

Change for Change sake

Russel Kirk's, in his Six Canons of Constructive Thought, I believe that out of the six enumerated writings, the sixth one is most appropriate for this writing, wherein he writes 6. Recognition that change and reform are not identical and that innovation is a devouring conflagration often than it is a torch of progress. In short it is apart from material objects; not like it is written in concrete. Change for Change sake is not to the better of or the worst of--change without cause is like blowing in the wind. Life starts out/begins as a change--and propels you through life in a change of life learning experience from the day you are born until the day you die. But change for changes sake alone is not always for the better. Today we have a candidate for the Presidency of this Great Nation leading the Charge for Change but a change to what? Thousands upon thousands of his followers are properly carrying his banner for change yet, they know not what change can bring. Ask any of them to tell you what great changes are to come forth, if Obama is elected to be our next President. Frankly I doubt that he even knows what changes he can, in fact, bring about. Remember, he, the President can only propose. It is the Congress that will dispose. Under our nations two party system and in today's climate, no matter who or what is proposed--it is hardly ever advanced. In the real world--Change--is hard to come by. And often when you get change you soon come to realize that you have been--SHORT CHANGED! "The enthusiasm of noble natures is aroused only by difficulties." ALSOP The Messenger

Is whitey personna non grata

Recently Hillary made a comment to the effect that the white man is a hardworking man. You would think that, in the minds of all to many blacks that she, in effect, and by mentioning only the white men, that the blacks were also hard workers, she in effect, stepped on the holy grail of our black citizens. She should know, by now, that it was the Blacks, in their minds, who actually are the builders of this nation. That, without their labors, our country would have never achieved its growth rate and many other causes. In short, this was a raciest comment. Nonsense, it was a state- meant of fact. They are relaying on the Diversity of this nation, in order to be able to make such a comment. In this manner, the white man can no longer be recognized as the founders and builders of this country. I wonder how they could cry that under slavery, they were not free to do anything but work for their master. If this be true, they could not have been sufficiently capable of moving around this nation, as would be required to be involved, to any great extent, in Nation building. You cannot have it both ways! In this day and age, and because, over the past 40 years or more, our Socialistic Schools did not teach American history as it should have been thought. What we have allowed for is the Unionized Socialists now prevalent in our Schools System, that have been brain-washing our children over these past many years. What they don't know about their Country, is its complete history. As such, the are very easy to deceive and0 can be led to believe what the socialists only want them to know. With the forthcoming Presidential election, if either Hillary or Obama manages to win the Presidency, you can say goodbye to this nation and its past glories. Mark my words, the White man will become a Tax Slave to the Democratic, freeloaders, now a major part of its Constituency. Their is an old axiom, frequently used when learning to or practing how to type, that is: Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. If you don't, you will live to rue the day. As well. your children and grandchildren. "Provincialism is a universal problem which all groups must confront; it is not a moral deformity confined to the whites." Dinesh D'Souva The Messenger

To Big Al - please explain

With the little I know about the Universe and what effects it may have on Global Warming, I am hoping you may help me to understand it a little better. For example: I know that the Sun is the source of all of natures heat/light source, and I also know the the Sun is 93 million miles from Plant earth and that it is, when rounded out, 100 times larger than our planet. For instance, and with these facts in mind, how can you come to any sensible or reasonable conclusion that man can, so to speak, be a greater power when it comes to global warning then the sun is? Please explain. Also we know that the Universe is believed to be 15 Billion Years Old and the Planet Earth is, when rounded out 5 billion years old. Also, that today the worlds population is also at the 5 billion years old mark. In short, over the life span of this planet, we have only recently come to reach the 5 billion mark in human habitation on this planet or l human per 1 year of this planets existence. In consideration of how this planet came to reach the age when it could have climatic forces suitable for making it possible for human habitation, don't you think you are sort of jumping to a conclusion not in evidence, at this time. During these 5 Billions of year, our planet has suffered numerous and in many cases circular Climatic changes, that only advanced it towards the time when in fact, humans could not only habitat on this planet but also became prosperous and beneficial to our planet. Al, as you know, and despite the Ozone hole in the sky, your story seems to be just a pie in the sky scheme to terrorize our citizens so that you can sell them so, to speak "hot air" such as, Carbon Footprints? China, as you should know, has over 1 billion people or 1/5th of the world Population, if people are the cause of global warning, can one not say that it is the primary source for causing global warming. If this is so, how come, when it comes to the Global Warming treaty, it is not a signature to it? Since Planet Earth, is unlike an oven, it has different temperatures, in different area's and climates around the world. Also, since our planet rotates around the Sun, at no time is our planet being heated, entirely, by the Sun. In view of this how can one predict, into the future, what climate changes will occur. Therefore, could we not also use scare tactics to frighten millions of our planets citizens into fearing this or that is going to happen! I am left to wonder since our deserts of millions of years ago, have been the least habitable by humans, how come they are always several degrees hotter than the normal heat variables found on our planet. Such as: Hot Cold, Warm, Freezing, Cooling, High humidity, low humanity wet or dry and on an on. Just what great influences does man have on the climate of the earth? Ask any knowledgeable Weather man, what he can actually tell you about today's weather , let alone in years to come. No person one this planet is capable of predicting the future or the weather. In the real world, man's influence on the earths climate is negligible. Let's just leave it in the hands of mother nature and natures God, as we have in the past and should continue into the future. Al, all I can say is get a Life and stop running around the world trying to terrorize the ignorants that usually cater to your nutty, hair brained Ideas! The Messenger

Dems on the road to Socialism

Hillary Clinton, in her address to her Indiana supporters said, in part, its been a long road to her minor victory in this State and she is right. As a Socialist, it has been a long trip in time and as well principle. This, her path, the Democrats have been on since the year 1902, has been with the policies and philosophy of the American Federation of Labor which advocated the principles of international socialism. By 190o Eugene V. Deb's, the nations leading socialist of that time which was, in effect, to lead the charge to socialism in this country. Since that time and to the present, it has been the goal of the Socialist Democratic Party, to do all within their power, to destroy Capitalism in this country and to turn our nation into a socialistic state. Today we have two Democratic Candidates--Hillary and OBama-- each leading the charge to carry the banner of Socialism, as the Next President of this Nation. If you do not believe this, either you are dumb, do not understand what socialism is or, a willing conspirator. There object is to turn our nation into a Socialistic State, or better stated, a Utopian Dream. Just what is Socialism: According to the Dictionary it is - Socialism n. 1 A political Economic theory of Social organization which advocates that the community as a whole should own and control the means of production, distribution and exchange. 2. policy or practice based on theory. If you are a follower of either of these candidates for the Presidency, you must surely be aware that the changes being advocated is the destruction of our government and as well our Capitalistic society. Unless your a fool or a total idiot, you must come to this conclusion. With every speech either of them makes, it is without doubt an attack on our nations Corporations, Businesses and our economic systems. Socialism can only function in a controlled endowment, that is with a few at the top, the leaders, and the masses/citizens at the botton of the pole. Only in this manner can they lead. Once you have given them complete control over the Productive Part of our country, the buying of the citizenship, through government largess (WELFARE) they will dominate and control your every form of lifestyle--not for the betterment, but for the Domination! Remember and it has been said over and over, a Government that can give you everything can take away everything you have. There eventual move will be toward a one world government! "There is nothing wrong with discontent at having a modest place in the scheme of things. That very discontent produced the ambition that built the culture of yesterday and today. But the discontent of those times was accompanied by discipline, willingness to work hard, and ready acceptance of a competitive society." William A Henry. The Messenger.

Open letter to Rosie

Dear Rosie, I see you have another hater to help bash American--The American that has given you a life, no other country could do. You and the Rev. Wright, are obviously, very sick people. Only in American can two untalented individuals, be so greatly rewarded. Rosie, it is easy to hate, and I guess that is why you have chosen you country of origin--the country where you were born--to spew your Vernon and hatred on! I can understand your choice--you live in a country that gives each citizen the right to think and say what you want, regardless of its truth. I know you are ignorant about many things for you have made that fact, obvious. It has been written that a person that does not know its countries history, is to remain forever a child. As such, you are to be considered a child in all the ways a banners you have displayed. You are, at the age where you still cannot, in your mind come to grips that you feel you were born a man in a women's body! As such, you cannot stand being looked upon as a women so, in your mind, you have to display your manhood in other ways--such as hating though you do not really want to. Or directing hate for your homeland, you place of birth, for bringing you into a land you can never understand--this fact is born out by you hateful attacks on this nation. Rosie, you once demonstrated how you can swing upside down, on stage and on TV. In this position you reminded me of a Bat, hanging upside down in its cave. This is the way you see your world! You make life choices based on your innate hatred for the lifestyle you are now forced to bear. You have a good heart but a confused mind. You need help! Get it as soon as possible, while there is some hope. But the last thing you need, is to endorse another one perhaps even sicker than you are! Rev. Wright is a very sick person. His hatred for his country is not like yours, he has a totally warped view of his race as well as his country and in this manner, he has chosen a house of worship to do nothing but Preach hatred--he is a very,very sick man. He must be avoided at all costs. He is not a man of salvation but of hate and bitterness. "The idea ofvi rtue is assimilated and grows into character through exercise, which means freedom of action in a world in which all things are not good." Richard M. Weaver. The Messenger

Open letter to Rosie

Jefferson - Jackson day Dinner

Boy, the Democrats attending this dinner, were really well fed--that is fed a line of Soicialism that made the Audiance hip and hollow like a bunch of kiddies running wild in a candy storeTo see such a reaction, from a crowd of American Cities, is a crying shane. Freedon from want hell, its freedon to want everything gieven to them on a silver plater paid for by the Tax Payers of American. I do not believe their could have been one person in that crowd, tha You can now take our self-annointed "Por Clarss" none tax-paying class of freeloaders. A person of ay statue or fortitude could not assemble in such a crowd. Now I know why term of beggar had be renamed as part of the homeless--that is to hide there lazy asses from public view. The Democratic Party Picked, as there Party symbol, Andrew Jackson. This was because General Andrew Jackson, at the battle of New Orleans, acted steadfast and resolute, and with this thought in mind, they choose a Jackass to symimbolize their Party. Today, this symbol has been so degraded that now it mearly means that when two or more Democrats gather together--they get to show their ASS. This is as close to liven in a dream world, as one could get. Still we have over 40 percent of the Democratic Party, living in one way or another on the dole. This is a National Disgrace. We have million, living in poverty, throughout this world, and we of all people should not be crying por mouth. Get off the dole-- and just maybe the people in need could get a bigger share of our nations wealth to help them out What I would like to see, instead of free loaders takingt bus trips across the country to, in essance, cry their pea picking hearts out for more government largess; to quite spending your money on Grass, get off you Ass and do like themajority of our citizens do--work to earn their way in life--not bum their way through it, But this will not happen, not ony do we have a nation of freeloaders of which all to many of them, are nothing but a bunch of craven cowards. This is a class of weak minded Democerats that endorsed a devient class of Politicans , such as Bill Clinton and now wnat to give hi a chance to put him back into that little room off the oval office. These two came in the office of the Presidency as Arkansaw por mouths and coming out as the two citizens that were most highly enriched, , after leaving this office. Now the Democrats want to give them a second chance, I guess to come out at least twice as rich. They claim they don't like the Rich People, while at the same time they enriched thesleves as no other Prsident and his spouse have ever before, been so highly enriched--still they say they are for the little guy. "

A Minority in our own Country

As ethnic advocacy groups and their political allies organize there populations, whitin this country, Americans face, as well its heritage will soon change. Over the last many years, the Democratic Party, in order to gain political advantage, is doing all it can to organize the minorities and welcome them into their Party. If you doubt this, ask yourself just what is today's make-up of subject party. Every minority be it group or race, when combined, make up the majority of the membership of the Democratic Party, such as: Unions, Global warming advocates, ACLU, as well, Blacks, Mexicans/Hispanics, Indians, Asians and Islander's and so on.. This party, by gaining the votes of the minorities, are slowly but surely gaining full control of our Government and with it Our Country. And to make matters worse, if the present trends are allowed to continue unbounded the White Race, the founders of this country, will become a minority in their own country. If the present trend is allowed to continue, by the year 2050, the Hispanics/Mexicans will be 25 percent of the population, The blacks l3 percent and the Asian/Islander 14 percent for a combined number of 52 percent of our population. Add the Native Indian Population and the white race will be a minority, as stated, in our homeland. This is why Hillary wants sanctuary cities to exist. And if she is Elected, they will probably continue to increase in numbers. If this is allowed to happen, we will lose control of our country, to the minorities. And guess what--you will undoubtedly become a Tax Slave to provide all the government largess that these groups will want. Both Hillary and OBama are Socialists, and will cater to their minority groups until the cows come home. In this manner, if either one, Hillary or Obama is elected President, by the end of their first four years in office, our nation will have gone from a Free Society to a Full Blown Socialist Country. Mark my Words, its our country to lose!! "Liberals seem to want wealth without the rich." George Gilder The Messenger

Part 2. OReilly vs Hilllary

When Bill posed the question of Sanctuary Cities for Illegal allies, Hillary replied that she in effect would do nothing about it. Instead she said, in effect that it is our Governments fault because they did not close the borders. And this is true. Our Banks are also protected by our Government, and yet, we still have and will always have Bank Robbers. The point is that because our government did not catch all the illegals that come across our borders, once here they are home free. If this be true, then all bank robbers, once they escape from the law, they should be legally free of the crime. This is just the type of thinking we need in the White House. That is if you break the law, your home free. Where does this idiotic mind set come from. Also, she seems to think that because we went to War on two fronts, Afghanistan and Iraq, we made a mistake. This is tantamount to saying when Japan attacked and Germany and Italy also declared war on us, we should have only fought Japan, letting the Germans and the Italians free to attack us, knowing we would only fight Japan. Dumb! Just a little History here. At the time Japan attacked us on December 7, 1941, the population of the United States was 45 Million People. Still we managed to take on 3 superpowers of that time and kicked ass. Today we are a nation of over 300 million people and she is saying in effect we can't deal with it. And she is right. As long as this nation insists on fighting a Political Correct war, we will never be capable of winning a war. Today, we no longer have the will to fight. Time after time we have to listen to these excuses for manhood now prevalent throughout our we will never be able to win. So lets let the Lady Commander in Chief do what she wanted to do all along-- surrender, give up our nation to rule by a class of people that d their kids out with dynamite strapped to their body's to blow up innocents. We talk about 3, 000 of our soldiers getting killed in 5 years. How about 8,000 Killed on Iwo Jima in 30 days. Or how about 250 thousand of our military killed in 4 years, during WWII. Or how about 36,000 killed in just 3 years in Korea or maybe 58,000, killed in 8 years in Vietnam. But never mind, I got one that beats them all, how about in our Nations Civil War when we lost 600,000 in just four years. Now all you smart asses, tell me which ones we should not have fought. Today we are a Nation of Full Belly Wimps We listen to freeloaders, who are just a bunch of uneducated Pea Ants--just for your information a Pea Ant is, to a military man, the lowest form of life. There sole purpose is to lick the leavings off the Latrine Urinals. Our nations National Cemeteries are almost totally full of men who fought and died for this country and I'll bet my life that all these crybabies who think they know it all, have never taken a damn minute of their time to stop by one of these cemeteries to thank them. Never, in my long life, have I ever thought that I would live long enough to witness such a lack of patriotism now evident in our land. Such ignorant citizens that are now prevalent within our country. "Patriotism--Moral behavior at the national level. Parriotism--An abstract word use to describe a type of behavior as harshly practical a good brakes and good tires. It means that you place the welkfare your nation ahead of your own even if it costs you your life." Robert A. Heinlein The Messenger.