Sunday, May 18, 2008
Libralism - Is nothing buty CHANGE in perpetuity.
Obama's cry for change is being acclaimed as having a new idea for Change! What is this
great idea. Who Knows? Change for the sake of change, as it is being presented today,
is not change, it is a lack of understanding what has transpired, within our Nation through-out its spectacular and glorious History. The Problem is that it is not American that needs
a change, it is the Liberals that cannot make up their mind, hence they are always looking
for change. In 1902, It was the Socialist Democratic Party, later it became the Democratic
Party, now its the Liberal Democratic Party on the verge of becoming the Progressive Democratic Party. This is in essence a party that has yet to come to know itself and what
it really stands for.
To establish my point of view even further, I have extracted the following, from the book
"Right Thinking" by James D Hornfischer, as follow:
"American Liberalism is forever changing. Once it was for a color blind society, then it was
for a color based society. Once it was for the sexual revolution, then it became downright
puritanical and was consumed with questions of sexual harassment. It favored nuclear power beginning with the Truman administration and came to dread nuclear power as though
it were commensurate with the Black Death of hoary times. It favored vigorous opposition
to Communist Subversion during the Kenndy Administrating; then it favored "negotiation"
over disbarment. It ceaselessly advances progress throughout American society and then
abruptly changes its definition of progress. There is only one political value to which it
has always remained steadfast, namely, disturbing the peace. Liberalism is history's only
political movement founded on a misdemeanor."
Obama is nothing but the Democrats answer to what their next change ought to be. As
yet, Obama does not know or either he is to scared to admit that it is just another
confused sense of reasoning trying to pass for intelligence.
"It is a great ability to be able to conceal one's ability." Franqois de la Rochefoucauld
The Messenger
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment