9/11 once again Rememberd - Bush is not!

Winston Churchill, the Priminister of England in WWII, said: "In War their is no Substitute for Victory"I served 21 years in thE United states air force FROM 1948 - 1968. If YOU KNOW YOUR HISTORY, AND MANY OF YOU DON'T, THIS PERIOD OF SERVICE COVERED THE KOREAN AND VIETNAM WARS. In short I have some degree of credibility for what I am talking about, unlike our Liberal Press. ON 09-11-2001, THE MOST DASTARDLY ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY,IN OUR HISTORY, OCCURRED WHEN OVER 2700 OF OUR CIVILIAN CITIZENS WERE KILLED, FOR THE FIRST TIME, ON OUR NATIONS MAINLAND. WHEN PRESIDENT BUSH, AFTER BEING IN OFFICE LESS THEN NINE MONTHS, WAS TO FACE THIS CHALLENGE, WITH CONFIDENCE AND WITHOUT FEAR. WHEN HE WENT TO THE SCENE TO WITNESS THIS TRAGIC ATTACK ON THE TWIN TOWERS--HE MADE THIS PRONOUNCEMENT IN WORDS TO THE EFFECT: WE HEAR THEM AND SOON THEY WILL HEAR USS! WHIT THIS SAYING, HE RECEIVED A ROAR OF APPROVAL AS WELL AS A 90 PERCENT APPROVAL FROM HIS COUNTRYMEN. HOWEVER, THIS APPROVAL WAS NOT TO LAST! In just a few short months the liberal press and the socialist Democrats, like no other time in our nations history,set out to destroy him! No other president, in time of war has ever been so maligned as was George W. Bush BY the liberal media and all too many of our supposed loyal citizens. How could this have happened--because of the Pure ignorance of many of our citizens and the Democratic Party, as well the liberal press, in bed with this party. NEVER BEFORE IN OUR HISTORY, HAS A PRESIDENT RECEIVED SUCH A 'HATCHET JOB' FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIALISTS MOTIVATION. HOW, BY MAKING THE WAR OUT AS An UNNECESSARY WAR, WHICH WASBASED ON DELIBERATE DISTORTIONS AND LIES ABOUT THE TRUTH OF SUBJECT WAR, AS FOLLOWS: Many say it was a needless war, Iraq never attacked us. And Guess what, in every War in the 20Th century, that we participated in--we were never attack on our homeland. To emphasize this fact--North Korea was a UN operation, and North Vietnam never attacked us. In fact, we escalated the North Vietnam War based on LBJ LYING TO OUR CONGRESS ABOUT An ATTACK ON ONE OF OUR SHIPS IN THE GULF OF TONKIN. IN SHORT WE EXPANDED THE WAR BASED ON AN OUTRIGHT LIE. IN THIS WAR AND IN 8 YEARS WE LOST 58,000 MEN KILLED AND O 1OO,000, BASED ON A LIE. NOW LETS COMPARE BUSH'S RECORD. 1. Prior to 9/11 Iraq, was known to have killed 0ver 300,0OO of their own citizens. During this time, under President Clinton, the UNITED NATIONS IAEA, HAD CONDUCTED 14 INSPECTIONS WITHOUT FINDING ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. They were not on a Easter egg hunt--everybody in the world thought he had THEM, but some of our home front liberal fools. IN FACT SADDAM HUSSEIN ADMITTED, THAT IT WAS HIS GOAL TO FOOL THE WORLD INTO THINKING HE DID HAVE SUCH WEAPONS. 2. President Bush did not go to war without the consent of the congress. IN THIS WAR AND IN JUST 21 TWENTY-ONE DAYS, OUR MILITARY VANQUISHED ONE OF THE WORLDS LARGEST MILITARY FORCE. NEVER BEFORE IN OUR NATIONS HISTORY HAVE WE DONE SO. 3. GEORGE Bush HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 'MISSION ACCOMPLISHED' SIGN. IT WAS DONE BY THE SHIPS CREW, TO WELCOME HIM ABOARD. THOSE THAT EQUATE THE WORD MISSION WITH THE WORD WAR, ARE ONLY SHOWING THEIR STUPIDITY. THEY HAVE TWO DISTINCT AND DIFFERANT MEANINGS AND CANNOT BE USED INTERCHANGEABLE. ACCEPT BY THE THE LIBERAL MEDIA. 4. WHEN SEC. OF DEF. RUMFELD SAID; "YOU HAVE TO GO TO WAR WITH THE ARMY YOU GOT." IT WAS DURING THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, THE DEFENSE BUDGET WAS CUT, EVERY YEAR BY 5% OR SAID ANOTHER WAY BY 40% OVER THE EIGHT YEARS OF HIS PRESIDENCY. TO BEST ILLUSTRATE THE MEANING OF THESE CUTS, AT THE TIME HE ENTER THE OFFICE AS PRESIDENT, OUR ARMY CONSISTED OF ONE MILLION MEN AND WOMEN. BY THE END OF HIS TERM IT WAS 600,000. CLINTON HAD SO DEPLETED OUR FORCES, THAT IT WAS, FOR ALL PRACTICALITY, A SKELETON OF WHAT IT WAS, PRIOR TO HIS ADMINISTRATION. 5. HE, BUSH, WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR GROWING THE BUDGET DEFICIT--NUTS IT WAS THE GPVERMENT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS THAT SINCE 1999 WHEN IT WAS 79,9 PERCENT OF OUR BUDGET AND CONTINUED TO GROW, AND IT IS STILL GROWING. During this same period our entailment's continued to grow and now consumes over 80 percent of our national budge. Also,during these years our defense budget varied between 17 to 18 percent while discretionary spending varied between 2 and 3 percent. 6. IT WAS CONGRESS, BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT MEMBERS THAT INCREASED PORK SPENDING THAT CAUSED THIS BUDGET BREAKING SPENDING SPREE!. Bush FOR THE MOST PART, DID NOT VETO THESE PORK BILLS, BECAUSE CONGRESS ATTACHED THEM TO OUR DEFENSE BUDGETS. 7. THE WORST TWO YEARS OF HIS PRESIDENCY WERE THE LAST TWO,2007-2008, UNDER A DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED CONGRESS! NUFF SAID! HTTP;//themessengerpage.blogspot.com The Messenger I CAN GO ON, BUT I BELIEVE I HAVE MADE MY POINT--AND I WELCOME ANY CHALLENGES TO WHAT I SAY HEREIN! HTTP;//THEMESSENGERPAGE.BLOGSPOT.COM - THE MESSENGER