Without the will to Win - there can be no Victory

The last war we ENTERED, with a win to will TO WIN was WWII. Since that time we have went to WAR--lacking the will TO win--that is to fight to win and at all cost. Since the end of WWII, we went to war, not to win, but to obtain an objective--as such,this war ended in stalemate, which continues until this day. For over 50 years now a major portion of our military has been tied down at the 37th parallel, separating North Korea from South Korea. Our War with North Vietnam, was entered into with good intention, however after the death of President Kennedy, based on a lie and under Lydon B. Johnston, this war was greatly escalated based on all the wrong reasons. As such it ended in our nation being forced to cut and run. Each of these wars are, within themselves are a major study in history. But the Korea and Vietnam wars, clearly ma ks my point. In neither of these wars was the major force of this country,allowed to come into play. Under the United Nations and Civilians control of these wars--they ended in stalemate and defeat. Today we are continuing to fight a prolonged war--with no end in sight. Why, because we are once again, in battle, not being fully enforced, provided for an/or dedicated to winning. we are wain\ting for a new president to be elected. I guess that applies for here as well as in Afghanistan. We now have a president that probably never been in a good fight, in his personnel life, let along knowing how to fight a war--trying to act like he knows what the hell he is doing. Delay in war is a sign of is a sign of weakness as well as deliberate inaction or coward nice. In leadership/management there is only two reason for not getting the job done. They are: 1.You are either short of personnel or 2. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE DOING! OBAMA'S DELAYING TO PROVIDE THE ESSENTIAL MEN, AS REQUESTED BY HIS OWN APPOINTED COMMANDER AND HIS Delay IN REACHING A DECISION, IS HOW, NOT ONLY TO LOOSE A BATTLE BUT, AS WELl THE WAR. ONLY A DAMN FOOL COULD SEE THE FOLLY OF OBAMA'S ACTION--OR LACK THEREOF! TO WIN THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN, YOU CANNOT HUNGER DOWN IN AFGHANISTAN, BUT TAKE THE WAR TO THE ENEMY, WITH SUFFICIENT MANPOWER AND US OF OUR TOTAL MILITARY. Neither of which is presently being used. Is called using your full force of arm when carryingthe Battle/war to the enemy. So far, we have demonstrated a lack of courage to do so. In a manner of speaking, Obama has to either "poop or get off the pot." He cannot languish there while our troops are dying. The ability to lead, encompasses the need to act with due diligence and resolve. So far, we have been acting like Pusey---cats! "IN A STREET FIGHT OR A WAR, THE OBJECT IS TO GET THERE THE FASTEST WITH THE MOSTEST. HESITATE AND YOU LOOSE! THE MESSENGER http://themesseengepage.blogspot.com -