One must walk the walk before he can talk the talk

I, at times, feel that people just don't understand the complexities of living in a 3 Third Society. It leaves me to wonder, what have they been learning about life, as they participated in the growing-up factor. As I watch the kiddies, in unexplainable bliss, cheering on a person that they, in fact, know Little if anything about the person , like Obama, who is a good example. He is a man, until only recently has come on the stage of politics as a dedicated and well informed person. An accomplished person, a knowledgeable person, a person that can be trusted. I find that none of those things mentioned, have little association with the character of this man. Yes he can talk--so can a Parrot, Auto Sales Person, a Lower and so on. But each of these people have a career, a central purpose and a demonstrated ability to get results! (Except for the Parrot who is designed to bring pleasure and entertainment into the lives of its owners.) In short, Obama is an unknown quantity. What does he Stand for, Who is he Working for and what is his quantitative past. In short - Who and what the Hell has he done, that would make one thing he should and could become the President of the Great Nation. For instances, he acts and even claims he has military knowledge and expertise, but from where, from whom and by whom. He cannot even speak in the Language of the Military. Not only that, when he says he wants to only pull out the Combat troops, is he saying that he is going to leave the support troops behind? For his information it takes 4-7 or more, dependant on the mission, to support the Combat Soldier. Only Pulling these men out, would only put the support troops in harms way. In short you have to pull out the support troops along with the Combat forces. Also, when we speak of a surge, in today's lingo, we really mean we are reinforcing our men in the field. The term surge in military talk, means reinforcement by such and such amount of additional combat personnel. If the reinforcement allowed the accomplishment of the mission it bears witness to its success. It is a fact!. What the hell is all his him-hawing about, can he not understand the simple premise that the accomplishment of an objective goal/mission is a plus, a win? Why is, Obama, unable to grasp this fact. Is he so lacking in judgment? Folks have had the privilege of working with Boy Scouts While Stationed in Montana,. Within this group, one could find scouts more knowledgeable military-wise then Obama is or will ever be! Now like the Democrats did before, they are once again ready to put our nations finest in the hands of another incompetent boob when it comes to military knowledge. Obama, when it comes to warfare does not even know what street fighting is all about. His statement: We had not exit plan when we went into war--yes we did, it is called Victory. Travelling in the company of some of Chicago's, Slum Lords, Nutty Prists and Preachers, and much more, does not lend itself to being an effective leader--it shows bad judgement. And if Obama is elected to be our next President--it will show not only bad judgement but stupidity as. Thanks to Clinton failure to protect this country, causing the 9/11 incident to occur, we will once again be a country at risk, for hiving put a "nin-ka-poop" in charge defending our Nation. With this in mind I ask, are we once again, opening our country up to another 9/11? "No man who is not willing to bear arms and to fight for his rights can give a good reason why he should be entitled to the privilege of living in a free community." Theodore Roosevelt The Messenger By definition, a mission can be anything. Ask a Missionary. The Flag on the Ship that read Mission accomplished was a fact--it did not say we won the war, the war is over we have obtained victory in or and on and on. Only those that have no knowledge of Military Lingo, would claim otherwise. The ship at the time Bush landed, could have been, in fact, the ships mission to do so! Bush's successful landing could have been the purpose of the ships mission, to take him aboard. On the other hand, a War is normally a state of two or more groups, such as the indians wars or between Nations and yes even the War of the Worlds sometime in our distent future. However, for the most part, wars are usually conducted on the battle, with stand up armies. Today, we are faced in a war, unlike anyotherr war in Hisotry. We are figfhting an enemy that functions as army but as a cowardly group, that will even allow their women and children to be used as walking time bombs. The enemuy, in most instance look like the people surrounding them in the towns and villages, they enter. These are not warriors that we are facing, these are born and bread cowards. I am not authority on Wars, but I have read and become acquainted with the history of war, yes I served 21 years in the military, but I was in the support group, not the Combat. When Secretary of Defencence, said he went to war with the army provided, he really ws saying, he went to a war, with an army that had over 8 years in the Clinton Administration had decimated beyond belife. Undeer this Adminstration our military force had been cut by 40%, or from over 1,000.000 troops to 600,000 Our defense Budget had over this same time frame been cut at a rate of 5% each of the eight years of the CLinton adminstration.. In fact it. the military, had been nearly completely decimatedy by the time he, Clinton, left office. To top it office, in his ground war at 35,000 feet, in Serbia, he almost completed, used up all out nations smart bombs in the process. And for all you dumb buttes other there in the hiter land, Rumsfeld, Bush and all the others A bea on for th