Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Global Warming is a big hoax

The earths atmushpere is not stationary and in fact, moves around the earth in a pre-planned manner,in fact the trade winds, as well as jet streams and all winds that blow across this planet--in a essentially circular motion as follows: hot air raises and in a simplified explanation, as it rises upward toward the north pole it starts to cool, as it crosses the north pole the hot air becomes colder, as it cools it begins to fall in a circular manner down to the south pole circles the south pole and as it reaches the tropics area, it starts itwarms and starts it circular movement over again. As it moves around the globe we have a heat to cold-cold to heat circular transfer. As previously noted, this heat transfer is the result of the the Trade Winds. In this transfer, there is a certain amount of dissipation, that would, in effect have a great change in the winds, as they circle the globe. In this manner, an over abidance of any of the four essentials to life, had increased, such as the carbon it would not sit over the place where it was produced. These gases as they flow around the world,would also expand around the world, thus keeping them in balance, where none of them would grow in sufficient amounts to be harmful to life here on earth. Thus the Idea that only carbon gases would become larger in quantity, by mans emissions of carbon into the air, is not a proven fact. What we need to know, is what is the ratio of carbon gases, created by man, relative to the mass of the earths atmosphere; before we can say that it is harmful to man or even responsible for increased warming. My question, has those that claim increased amounts of carbon, created by man, is responsible for any thing but its true purpose! Until we quantified the amounts of increase relative to amounts of subject gas already in earths atmosphere we can make no conclusions. In my humble opinion, if this is done, we would find a dilatory effect , if any on our planet. The quantity of our atmospheric gases, relative to mans ability to create more of, is to simplistically advanced. Until theses gases are quantified, we have no way of measuring the effect of man made carbon increases on amounts of this gas are, relative to the total. I would hazard to guess that it would be infinitesimal. http://themessengerpage.blogspot.com - The Messenger

No comments: