Life begins at conception therer is no if when or buts

Folks I am sorry for, so to speak, harping on this subject, but today I saw a man on TV that I do not know and problem will never come to him. You this man has just been found guilty of killing another man. Why? I don't know. Maybe, in his mind, that was the only way to stop the mass killing of the unborn. This man did not look like a deranged killer, he looked to me like a pretty decent citizen. I cannot what was on his mind when he choose to kill another man. Could this be just another hate crime. I don't think so! After all, I am sure he knew that he could get into a lot of trouble because, today, in our enlightend citizenship, we now have a law that protects them from being harmed, based on hate. That;s good. But, in this vain I have to ask myself why there is no mitigating laws for Love crimes. This man is not a killer for some obscure reason. After all, he has for many years lead a good and decent life. Married had two children, and I assume he was a church going man with a love for his God, his family and mankind. What could have drove him to kill another man. No it was not for his personal benefit, for he was smart enough to know that what he was doing, and what the outcome for his act would be and knowing this killed th Doctor. No he killed for a much higher reason--he killed for the sanctity of life. I guess he is guilty of a love crime. But that is where he made his big mistake for, you see, if it was for a hate crime,he knew he would get a better deal from the judicial system of today. Oh no, we can kill with hate in our heart, but not for love. This man is and was, throughout his life, a law abiding citizen to suddenly go off the deep end and commit such a henious act against his fellow man. Surly, he knew, at the time of this act,right ffom wrong. How do we know this? Well, for one thing he did confess to his crime. Could it possibly be for the love of the unborn, he decided to forfiet his life to stop the killing of the innocents, the unborn. Some say he had to be insane to do what he did. Maybe so, but I firmly believe he committed this dastardly act out of love for the little children, yet unborn, but never-the-less a humen-bean! Don't you like me find it strange that you can plant the seeds of life in a petri dish, inplant it into the mother or surrogate mother, and at the time of implantation, you knew your were creathing a human life. However in its infinite wisdon, the supreme court, was unable to reason out the fact that if you impregnate a women with the seeds of life, it is at the time of conception, the beginning life of a humen bean Now I find this strange that 9 intelligent men/women could not figure this out. They knew that if you plant the seeds of a flower, that it will eventually come into bloom as a flower. Why is this! Well maybe no one told the flower seeds that life does not begin upon conception and or planting. This was, I guess, to complex for the judges to know that you plant the seeds of a flower, you get a flower. You plant the seeds of a humen, you get a human baby. Now is that so hard. Folks, there is no rational excuse for killing, but that should apply to all. The Doctor took an oath to protect humen life--to do no harm. Yet from his sence of reasoning, he choose to violate his professional duties and use his talents to destroy life. In this vain--he became a humen killing machine. NOW A MAN, A SUPPOSED LIFE SAVER, BECAME A MASS, KILLER A LIFE TAKER, FOR, I SUPPOSE MONEY. THE OTHER KILLED FOR LOVE OF MANKIND AND IN PARTICULAR THE UNBORN WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES. IN SOME PEOPLES MINDS, THEY MIGHT BE INCLAINED TO FEEL THE ABORTION DOCTOR GOT WHAT HE DESERVES. ON THE OTHER HAND, THE MAN WHO KILLED THE KILLER OF UNBORN CHILDREN--I HAVE TO BELIEVE HE DID IT OUT OF LOVE--WILL PERHAPS LOOSE HIS LIFE FOR THE CRIME HE COMMITTED. I wonder if the supreme court of these United States had paid more attention to the sanctity of life, none of this could have taken place. I find it straNge that the highest court of the land, could not have ruled that life begins at conception, and not at some arbitrary tri-mester. This man of untold compassion would have not found it necessary to forfiet his liberty, his honor and depending on the judges decision--his life! What have we beome! http://themessengerpage.blogspot.com The Messenger